2 ms·

You'll obviously get some virus in your body, but a lot less because most of it (hopefully) gets destroyed before it can reproduce.

• trompetenaccoun 5y ago
  It will still be picked up by a PCR test depending on the number of replication cycles. Which is why mass testing everyone, including healthy people, is such a dumb idea.
  • hef19898 5y ago
    Only if the number of cycles wasn't pre defined. Which it is, nobody is running cycles until a PCR test turns positive.
    • trompetenaccoun 5y ago
      That's not the only possibility. The number could also be predefined to a level making the tests too sensitive (which incidentally is the case in many countries, currently). If you have absolutely no virus particles the test couldn't detect them no matter how many cycles you go through. Generally in the past, it was accepted practice that doctors do specific tests to get more certainty with diagnosing certain infections in a patient that's showing symptoms matching that disease. You could make a case for mass testing healthy people for all kinds of infectious diseases but for economical reasons I doubt many would support it. If we did that we'd have to somehow account for all the false positives, then.