2 ms·
I'd imagine it's more of a defense in depth approach. Why do your adversary's work for them? Unsophisticated adversaries (ie. random anti-nuclear agitators) mig
by pseudo0 5y ago
I'd imagine it's more of a defense in depth approach. Why do your adversary's work for them? Unsophisticated adversaries (ie. random anti-nuclear agitators) might be dissuaded entirely due to the lack of information, and even sophisticated adversaries would have to take time and effort to verify those fingerprints and make sure they have the right spot. Unless there's a compelling reason to make the information public, I don't see why they would.
- SkyMarshal 5y ago>I'd imagine it's more of a defense in depth approach. Yes exactly. One necessary, but not sufficient, layer of a multi-layer defense-in-depth security strategy.