3 ms·
> i don't believe in physical limits for computation there are limits, we're just not close to them. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Limits_of_computation https
by sigstoat 5y ago
> i don't believe in physical limits for computation
there are limits, we're just not close to them.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Limits_of_computation https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Limits_of_computation
> when i read about 50MHz being the fundamental impossible to surpass limit
yeah i think the problem here is popular press writing
- trhway 5y agosome of those limits are applicable to black holes only in the state of thermodynamic equilibrium. The miniature unstable black holes/singularities produced using quark-gluon lithography may be not a subject to those limits, and miniature wormhole loops through 4th dimension may prove to be an effective workaround for storage limits, etc.
- comboy 5y agoIf you have some good points to disprove Heisenberg's rule then it's worth publishing a paper. If you are talking about quark litography (which does not physically make any sense as af as I can tell), then you are still agreeing with the parent comment, there are limits but we still have a long way.
- sigstoat 5y agoi hope that any of that has any bearing on engineering practice in our lifetimes.