>this article in particular actually does a good job of distinguishing I read it before I posted, and I think that by presenting wealth and income together, th

>this article in particular actually does a good job of distinguishing I read it before I posted, and I think that by presenting wealth and income together, they are conflating them. The terminology is nice, but it is not backed up by the content. For example how much of the wealth comes from income? I imagine a significant portion has not been recognized. Someone could be self-made and have billions in wealth but only a fraction of that has been recognized as income.