They are instituted as is and must be regarded from that point forward. Not enacted with intent that any judiciary can interpret simply because they overlooked

They are instituted as is and must be regarded from that point forward. Not enacted with intent that any judiciary can interpret simply because they overlooked something that wasn't required or a law at the point. Otherwise, how do you know if you're being moral or ethical if the government can incriminate you for not following an never-made-yet law? This goes down to personal ethics and everyone's is different. Legislating morality as we see with any religious country shows it's just a means of governmental control.