You're on very shaky ground here. It doesn't seem like you're trying very hard to respond to the strongest possible interpretation of the topic at hand, but ra

You're on very shaky ground here. It doesn't seem like you're trying very hard to respond to the strongest possible interpretation of the topic at hand, but rather some very finely sliced minutiae. And besides, we can measure one minutes contribution, and we can, if we choose, apply proportional mitigation factors or costs or penalties. We can look at past failures and use those to adjust our course. What exactly are you arguing against here?