Your argument is fundamentally wrong in that it assumes age is a good approximation of wisdom. Just because someone is N years old does not necessarily mean th

Your argument is fundamentally wrong in that it assumes age is a good approximation of wisdom. Just because someone is N years old does not necessarily mean they have N years of experience from which to derive wisdom. They could very well have done nothing but meet the most basal needs to sustain life for N years, having nothing to contribute to a greater dialogue.