3 ms·
The sources are literally direct links to nasa.gov. 1) Yes, the data was altered. 2) I can't prove a causal relationship between the alteration of the data an
by willmadden 5y ago
The sources are literally direct links to nasa.gov.
1) Yes, the data was altered.
2) I can't prove a causal relationship between the alteration of the data and a political narrative, but I believe in Occam's razor.
So, I've proven conclusively that NASA altered their temperature data in the 20th century from a cooling trend to a warming trend.
See for yourself.
- gspr 5y ago> So, I've proven conclusively that NASA altered their temperature data in the 20th century from a cooling trend to a warming trend. So this is your new claim. Please write out in clear text that you've moved the goalposts since last time – make it clear what you're claiming now. Then I'll be happy to consider your sources. Just wanna make sure you don't move the goalposts again - as dishonest crackpots tend to.
- willmadden 5y agoI'm not doing any more work for you. Follow the instructions I already wrote out for you to see the proof. I'm done here.
- gspr 5y agoAh yes, the last stage of the crackpot: "do your own research" I'm not asking you to do work for me. I'm asking you to clearly state your claim so that you can't move the goalposts again. The fact that you've done it once, makes me certain you'll do it again and thus invalidate any work I do. State your current claim in clear text, crackpot.
- willmadden 5y agoDear idiot: I gave you two direct nasa.gov links that show they changed the US temperature data from the 1930's, and throughout the 20th century.