4 ms·
Is there widespread censorship? https://ivmmeta.com https://ivmmeta.com links to all sorts of studies published on the effectiveness of ivwhatever, all as supp
by admax88q 5y ago
Is there widespread censorship?
https://ivmmeta.com https://ivmmeta.com links to all sorts of studies published on the effectiveness of ivwhatever, all as support for using it.
It sounds more like the rest of the research/medical community is just not convinced.
- shaicoleman 5y agoYes, indeed. Again, this discussed here: https://covid19criticalcare.com/videos-and-press/flccc-releases/flccc-alliance-statement-on-the-irregular-actions-of-public-health-agencies-and-the-widespread-disinformation-campaign-against-ivermectin/ https://covid19criticalcare.com/videos-and-press/flccc-relea... And in video form here: https://youtu.be/LkIKCbwBcLU?t=702 https://youtu.be/LkIKCbwBcLU?t=702
- admax88q 5y agoYeah I don't buy it. You're moving the goalposts. Censorship is when they prohibit information being distributed. It looks like Government Health Agencies are just not believing the evidence and are therefore not recommending it. They're not saying "don't talk about it" they're not saying "don't research it" they're saying "the evidence so far is inconclusive, we don't recommend treating with it" That's not censorship. Just found this overview by NIH on why they don't recommend treament. https://www.covid19treatmentguidelines.nih.gov/antiviral-therapy/ivermectin/ https://www.covid19treatmentguidelines.nih.gov/antiviral-the... Pretty detailed overview of why they are not convinced. Are they wrong? Maybe, but they're not censoring anything in my books.
- shaicoleman 5y ago> Just found this overview by NIH on why they don't recommend treatment. What do they recommend? Wait until you're sick enough to go to hospital. This a year in a half into the pandemic, and you don't see the problem? Compare this to the treatment protocol of the FLCCC https://covid19criticalcare.com/covid-19-protocols/i-mask-plus-protocol/ https://covid19criticalcare.com/covid-19-protocols/i-mask-pl... > Maybe, but they're not censoring anything in my books. I'd estimate about 90% of social media posts about Ivermectin get censored on social media. https://www.wsj.com/articles/youtube-cancels-the-u-s-senate-11612288061 https://www.wsj.com/articles/youtube-cancels-the-u-s-senate-... https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2021/feb/16/craig-kelly-banned-from-facebook-for-a-week-for-posting-covid-misinformation https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2021/feb/16/craig... They literally have policies saying if you're posting anything about Ivermectin, it's misinformation, and it will get removed. How is that not censorship? https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/9891785 https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/9891785 Just now the Ivermectin Global Summit has been removed from YouTube. A medical conference gets removed and you claim that there's no censorship? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nGefHqcnmio https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nGefHqcnmio You probably won't believe the censorship until you'll experience it first hand.
- admax88q 5y agoYou started by claiming > Part of the problem that there is censorship on publishing in the big journals. and so far your evidence is censorship by youtube and facebook.