4 ms·
>given that the immunity you get from having the disease is always better than what you'd get from a vaccine This is false. Stop spreading misinformation.
by jf22 5y ago
>given that the immunity you get from having the disease is always better than what you'd get from a vaccine
This is false. Stop spreading misinformation.
- rsj_hn 5y agoStop spreading misinformation. My comment was not false, and in fact is quite obvious. e.g. from https://www.michigan.gov/documents/mdch/Waiver_Ed_Natural_Immunity_479884_7.pdf https://www.michigan.gov/documents/mdch/Waiver_Ed_Natural_Im... "It is true that natural infection almost always causes better immunity than vaccines."
- SketchySeaBeast 5y agoThe only argument that document takes about it actually being better is that with some vaccines you need two shots instead of one. That's not compelling as being "better" at all. "Better" would imply that, once the complete course of vaccination is complete, the immunity is somehow more complete, stronger, or longer lasting.
- jf22 5y agoQuite often what is "obvious" isn't true. Take some time and do some reading on this topic and you'll find that vaccines can provide equal or better immunity than a natural infection.
- jhayward 5y agoYour comment was indeed false, and many many studies have been done to compare natural vs vaccine immunity. Vaccination with a highly effective vaccine, e.g. Moderna or Phizer/BNT yield higher antibody response, and are more protective against variants in study after study.
- JPKab 5y agoYou don't have the authority to decide what is misinformation and what isn't. If you disagree with it counter it with your own facts but you are not the speech police.
- jf22 5y agoWho are the speech police and who has the authority?