4 ms·
I don’t know anything about how effective that might be, but I imagine the logistics of transporting a live, deadly virus would be a nightmare.
by gurleen_s 5y ago
I don’t know anything about how effective that might be, but I imagine the logistics of transporting a live, deadly virus would be a nightmare.
- nednar 5y agoIn many locations you have hospitals close by with covid stations. So you could bring the people to the virus.
- insaneirish 5y agoAnd that would work how, exactly?
- sebmellen 5y agoWalk the people through the respiratory ICU ward without PPE? Not endorsing it, just brainstorming...
- nednar 5y agoFor me, this would be a point where I would fully rely on the experts for deciding how to implement that step and check if the plan is feasible. I don't recommend executing such ideas without syncing with authorities and experts. That shouldn't stop us from brain storming, though, and allow experts to decide, if it's an interesting idea or stupid.
- gls2ro 5y agoWouldnt this just create the environment for a more resistant virus in a shorter period of time? I did not calculated the chances yet but here is what my probability intuition is saying Having 50% of population go through virus in one year creates a less fit environment for a more resistant mutation than having 50% of population being exposed to virus in 2-3 months. Like more encounters over a shorter period of time is a good environment to allow survival of resistant mutations.