4 ms·
> IMHO, the decision of whether to show auto-complete should be with the user and not with the website It;s fundamentally wrong to decide what 'rights' website
by ROARosen 5y ago
> IMHO, the decision of whether to show auto-complete should be with the user and not with the website
It;s fundamentally wrong to decide what 'rights' website users have (aside from when it comes to privacy).
There are myriad ways how a website can become un-user friendly to the point of being unusable not the least is of which you can completely disable the cursor or completely not display certain parts which are really there (e.g. display: none).
Point being there is a fundamental 'trust' which a user gives to a website developer, that the website they visit will behave as 'the developer' intended. The user even expects to get the site just s the developer created it, however 'bad' that may be.
Now of course it is in the interest of the web developer to make their site user-friendly if they want to appeal to a wide populace. But it is totally in the purview of the developer to make the site even completely unusable.
I don't understand how a browser has the audacity to force their assumptions on site behavior on the user/developer.
- akersten 5y agoIt's especially bad because the holier-than-thou attitude broke real, commonly-used websites , the Chrome team was made aware of the use cases, and they just didn't care. For example, Chrome tried auto-completing my home address into Expedia for where I'd like to vacation. So it's not even those "corner case big boring CRM business apps" that had to find workarounds to forced-autocomplete, it's "real" user-facing ones too. Very frustrating.