Pacman and cargo accomplish completely different tasks. One is a package manager for a language and a language alone, the other is a package manager for a whole

Pacman and cargo accomplish completely different tasks. One is a package manager for a language and a language alone, the other is a package manager for a whole operating system. Pacman can not be responsible for a build failing, since it doesnt build anything in the first place... Apart from that, most modern languages come with a package manager nowadays. Why do you like rust more than go? Or nim? Or elixir? Or crystal?