From the article: > This leaves OpSecSecurity's explanation as by far the most likely—rather than the "spoofed notice" being sent directly to u/NateNate60 by t

From the article: > This leaves OpSecSecurity's explanation as by far the most likely—rather than the "spoofed notice" being sent directly to u/NateNate60 by the attacker, it was most likely sent to Comcast, which passed the warning on in accordance with its DMCA policy. > Update: Ars was able to review the headers of the email from Comcast to u/NateNate60, and confirm their authenticity. The DMCA warning he received did come from Comcast, not a third party. So I guess whether you believe this was bogus depends on whether you believe OpSecSecurity. They claimed to have incontrovertible proof. I guess they should probably display that proof.