3 ms·
This is a very interesting comment for future historians, as it shows how people convince themselves that they have absorbed substance when in fact there is no
by the_optimist 5y ago
This is a very interesting comment for future historians, as it shows how people convince themselves that they have absorbed substance when in fact there is no such substance.
Virtually no aspect of your statement extends beyond press headlines, where the content and follow-on of each of these stories entirely defused the substance of the respective headline. That is why the whole thing that you believe is very important amounted to a pile of dust.
- tonystubblebine 5y agoThis comment would be more valuable if you’d made it in a constructive way with even one detailed example of defused substance.
- triceratops 5y agoThat's the irony. Their own views don't have any actual substance.
- triceratops 5y agoThe irony of talking about substance when offering practically none in one's own comment. > Virtually no aspect of your statement extends beyond press headlines I didn't realize I was writing an exam with essay-type questions.