5 ms·
Stalin's grip wasn't absolute either. We still know about Trotsky, despite his efforts. That doesn't mean the censorship didn't have very real consequences.
by ergot_vacation 5y ago
Stalin's grip wasn't absolute either. We still know about Trotsky, despite his efforts. That doesn't mean the censorship didn't have very real consequences.
- krapp 5y agoStalin controlled an entire country, Facebook only controls its own platform. What "very real" consequences did Facebook have beyond its platform?
- loveistheanswer 5y agoStalin would have killed to have the powerful tools that Zuckerberg has. Stalin only had control over the speech and thoughts of around one hundred million people in one country. Zuckerberg has control over the speech and thoughts of around three billion people in countries across the world.
- krapp 5y ago>Zuckerberg has control over the speech and thoughts of around three billion people in countries across the world. That's ridiculous, Zuckerberg has control over neither. Does my cellular service provider control my speech and thoughts? Does Microsoft control my speech and thoughts because I use Windows? Does the Post Office control my speech and thoughts because they collect and deliver the mail? No, no and no. I don't think you understand what the word "control" means.
- loveistheanswer 5y agoControl: the power to influence or direct people's behavior or the course of events. You don't think communication influences or directs people's behavior?