> I infer from this and your domain name that you plan on using ML ... Yep > I’m curious if you remember the example. Also - Tog worked at Apple for 14 years

> I infer from this and your domain name that you plan on using ML ... Yep > I’m curious if you remember the example. Also - Tog worked at Apple for 14 years I couldn't find it, although he has another post on Fitt's Law. The phrase he used was "pulling defeat from the jaws of victory" - maybe it's on Archive.org > it’s kludge but it has nothing to do with them not knowing fitts law. Yeah, my characterization is a bit unfair > Did you know that many of those folks went front Parc to Apple and continued their research? I did have a chance to meet Jef Raskin a few times. He was between Apple stints, working on the Canon Cat. He's the one who turn me onto Card, Moran, Newell 1983 -- and thus Fitt's Law. I don't doubt there is a lot of thought that goes into refining the UI. However, there's the quandary of breaking the current idiom, which limits change. However, for low vision folks, there is less of a switching cost. Same holds for newer devices, like glasses. > Do you have the core technology proven out yet? Tis incomplete. Some parts of the interaction model. Am a bit weak on the ML part. May license GPT-n. Looking to form a team. Just convinced my blind friend to join. He kinda pioneered AR in the 90's.