3 ms·
Sorry for incorrect wording. I don't need multipath to be present in the same spec as the QUIC core. What I meant is when I will be able to have slightly less t
by ivan4th 5y ago
Sorry for incorrect wording. I don't need multipath to be present in the same spec as the QUIC core. What I meant is when I will be able to have slightly less then 150Mbps over QUIC for e.g. a single file if I have 3x50Mbps connections. MPTCP can do that for me, even if the server doesn't support it as I can use something like OpenMPTCPRouter [1]. I hope multipath QUIC will be able to do that too, but it's not ready for production use yet, if I understand correctly.
[1] https://www.openmptcprouter.com/ https://www.openmptcprouter.com/
- tweenagedream 5y agoSeems like there are quite a few options that show up pretty quickly when searching for multipath udp e.g: https://github.com/angt/glorytun https://github.com/angt/glorytun Would that work for you?
- ivan4th 5y agoPosted a detailed explanation slightly above... Glorytun will not work to well with TCP b/c it doesn't provide separate congestion control for each path like MPTCP does.