8 ms·

Erlang and Lisp aren't exactly canonical examples of procedural programming languages.

• jey 19y ago
  This has been pointed out to them (months ago), but they haven't fixed their posting.
  • elq 19y ago
    That's really pathetic. Me thinks they're not going to get the best qualified people with that kind of attitude.
• machine 19y ago
  I don't see it on there, they must have taken it down. That said, Lisp isn't a really a pure functional language either if that is what you are implying (setf). I don't know enough about Erlang to say anything about that. It is odd that they specify "procedural" though. Anyone that knows a programming language probably knows a procedural programming language.
• brlewis 19y ago
  No, but they look like procedural programming languages to people who are deep into, for example, Haskell. Maybe loopt wants to present itself as on the forefront of functional programming.