4 ms·
Not to mention many of the early proponents were notorious conspiracy theorists, racists, and nut jobs who spoke with absolute certainty, cited virtually no evi
by coffeefirst 5y ago
Not to mention many of the early proponents were notorious conspiracy theorists, racists, and nut jobs who spoke with absolute certainty, cited virtually no evidence and clearly had no idea what they were talking about. Could they, in their wild speculation, been right about a few things? Sure, that’s always possible, but they didn’t actually know that at the time.
This isn’t a science or mainstream media problem; both require something resembling empirical evidence to make factual claims. It’s a problem of bullshitters, who can just stay stuff. If you want to be clear that they’re full of it, you run the risk that they actually guessed right.
- the_optimist 5y agoThis is an interesting way to evaluate ideas. Where did you learn this technique?
- tux1968 5y agoIt's very common and easy to learn these days. It's everywhere.
- coffeefirst 5y agoNot the ideas. This entire thread is about public discourse. It's completely independent of whether the virus actually escaped from the lab.