4 ms·
I'll get downvoted for this. Argument (I don't completely agree, but someone will make it sometime)- I think it is not good for humanity to trust the jurisdict
by arihant 15y ago
I'll get downvoted for this.
Argument (I don't completely agree, but someone will make it sometime)- I think it is not good for humanity to trust the jurisdiction of a country which has demonstrated tainted judgement by getting involved in nuclear weapons and given their recent involvements in the middle east. The United States is not the country whose jurisdiction should control any form of worldwide open platform.
Just a thought. This stuff needs some sort of international law. No jurisdiction in the world is good enough to rule the web, in any damned way. We cannot take our narrow minds into the future for our race.
- younata 15y ago> getting involved in nuclear weapons Pretty much every western country has nuclear weapons. If you're referencing the fact that the US is the only country to have dropped nuclear weapons on another country, keep in mind that it wasn't until 30 or so years later that we realized how bad nuclear weapons are. Hell, in the 80s, at my uni, there was an experiment to see if you could use nuclear radiation to clean toilet water. Don't get me wrong though, I agree with your other points.
- tobylane 15y agoPretty much every? No http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Countries_with_nuclear_weapons http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Countries_with_nuclear_weapons Nuclear radiation is very different to weapons, your local major hospital has a dozen different uses for radiation (more powerful than cleaning water).