3 ms·
When done correctly, microservices can replace a gigantic single point of failure. Unfortunately, what I sometimes see is that it's replaced by multiple intera
by yongjik 5y ago
When done correctly, microservices can replace a gigantic single point of failure.
Unfortunately, what I sometimes see is that it's replaced by multiple interacting single points of failures - i.e., if any one of them fails the whole rube goldberg architecture fails, and there are so many different things that can fail! ...which is clearly worse than just having a monolith.