This is a tricky and complicated subject. Under what conditions should a corporation like Cisco be responsible for censoring or imposing its values, whatever th

This is a tricky and complicated subject. Under what conditions should a corporation like Cisco be responsible for censoring or imposing its values, whatever they are, upon clients? For instance, should it be expected to regulate purchases to organizations that support the KKK? That oppose abortion? That support immigration? That support flag burning? That support cap-and-trade? That oppose the estate tax? Certainly some of these are heinous and orthogonal to American values and some are not. The question is: when should a corporate citizen not be neutral?