> It only seems expensive and complicated from the perspective of someone that does not have experience with it. Isn't that the target audience for this sort o

> It only seems expensive and complicated from the perspective of someone that does not have experience with it. Isn't that the target audience for this sort of change? I mean, do you see teams of networking , siteops, high availability, and security engineers hanging around doing nothing and just waiting for a company to decide to go in-house? No, because those teams do not exist in free-range. That's something a company needs to build and train and experiment from the start until they are able to learn all the lessons.