3 ms·
https://www.psmsl.org/data/obtaining/stations/20.php https://www.psmsl.org/data/obtaining/stations/20.php https://www.psmsl.org/data/obtaining/stations/23.php h
by the-dude 5y ago
https://www.psmsl.org/data/obtaining/stations/20.php https://www.psmsl.org/data/obtaining/stations/20.php
https://www.psmsl.org/data/obtaining/stations/23.php https://www.psmsl.org/data/obtaining/stations/23.php
https://www.psmsl.org/data/obtaining/stations/24.php https://www.psmsl.org/data/obtaining/stations/24.php
- titzer 5y agoAre you gaslighting me or what, dude? Because your own very first link shows a clear sea-level rise of almost 20 centimeters from 1900. (this https://www.psmsl.org/data/obtaining/rlr.annual.plots/20_high.png https://www.psmsl.org/data/obtaining/rlr.annual.plots/20_hig..., if you are incapable of clicking on links in actual webpages). What are you trying to say? It hasn't accelerated? Because clearly it must have sped up since before records began, otherwise it would not agree with records and reconstructions from 1000 and 2000 years ago.
- the-dude 5y agoFirst of all, that is in no way an acceptable way to perform a conversation. Secondly, can you read? From my comment : > Sea level rise at the Dutch coast has been stable
- titzer 5y agoTo be brutally honest, it tests people's patience when someone posts trollish, curt, unsupported comments like "it's not accelerating here at place X" when a specific location is clearly not at issue, out of context, and out of perspective of the global problem. Then we end up down a rathole dispelling the stink around another unnecessary distraction which is clearly motivated by nothing but muddying the waters. It's just obfuscation and FUD, frankly. Sorry that it's uncomfortable when you're called out on it.
- the-dude 5y agoSo, you failed at basic reading comprehension and now you are blaming me? Your link fails to load here at my Dutch internet connection btw. edit: climate.gov loads again.