Surely frequent contact with a lower-cost specialist who is trained to monitor for situations requiring escalation very much implies better care? Maybe I'm mis

Surely frequent contact with a lower-cost specialist who is trained to monitor for situations requiring escalation very much implies better care? Maybe I'm misreading your tone, but it sounds like you're dismissing midwifery as being only about cost savings. I don't think that's true at all (parent of three; we did a midwife for the younger two), but even if that was a major motivation, it's like saying SpaceX is only about cost savings. The cost savings are a game changer in terms of access/frequency/etc.