3 ms·

https://forthelifeofme-film.com/2019/07/30/the-most-bizarre-pow-camp-during-wwii-curragh/ https://forthelifeofme-film.com/2019/07/30/the-most-bizarre-... "Havi

by qw 5y ago

https://forthelifeofme-film.com/2019/07/30/the-most-bizarre-pow-camp-during-wwii-curragh/ https://forthelifeofme-film.com/2019/07/30/the-most-bizarre-... "Having negligible military power, Ireland was a neutral nation during the war; Prime Minister Éamon de Valera went to great lengths to maintain that neutrality. As part of this policy, he made a deal with both the British and German governments: combatants of either country could be detained if found in Ireland and interned there for the duration of the war." "Technically, the men were not prisoners of war but “guests of the State,” with an obligation on the state to prevent them from returning to the war." "The reason was that Ireland’s neutrality was important not only to the Irish but to Great Britain as well. Though Churchill considered Ireland’s refusal to fight a betrayal, he understood that a pro-Nazi Ireland would have allowed the Kriegsmarine to use its Atlantic ports and wreak havoc on vital convoys from America."

peeters 5y ago
But where does that say that the British would send Brits back to Ireland? Edit: The article mentions a single example of an escapee being sent back from Northern Ireland, not GB. > He had lunch at a nearby hotel, left without paying and made his way to nearby Dublin, where he boarded the first train to Belfast in Northern Ireland. To his surprise, his superiors were far from pleased when he reported at his base and he was quickly sent back across the border to the internment camp. It seems like the emphasis was on whether the escape came about from (perceived) Irish apathy or as a "legitimate" escape attempt. The Brits would return a prisoner who violated the terms of their day parole, but not those who legitimately escaped.