3 ms·
To be fair, they said the response "to .. is" as in "it ( ought to / should ) be" - not "was" Point stands though. Lacking the ability to argue the case, the p
by Chris2048 5y ago
To be fair, they said the response "to .. is" as in "it ( ought to / should ) be" - not "was"
Point stands though. Lacking the ability to argue the case, the press often derive authority from the ability to slander, censor and humiliate.
- loopz 5y agoPlease show citations of that then, of mainstream media doing the: slander, censor and humiliate, instead of just reporting one side or the other as usual. Heck, US has a mature president now even acknowledging there are two major competing hypotheses. Seeing leaders embracing uncertainty is rare, so it seems humanity is going through a learning phase right now, having to face up to uncertainty and fear.
- Chris2048 5y agoWhat do you mean by "citation"? An academic reference, or an example? There are examples of these in these comments, so if you doubt that these things are true (and cannot find examples in this thread) then please narrow it down to one - this isn't a wikipedia articles, theres as much burden on you to disprove something you disagree with, and you haven't yet stated you disagree with anything.
- loopz 5y agoAn example. I didn't find anything concrete in the comments. So there's nothing further to discuss.