4 ms·
The creator of a thing can decide to remove their copy of it and not license it further. Someone else can pay for a token that signifies... something. At the v
by Inhibit 5y ago
The creator of a thing can decide to remove their copy of it and not license it further.
Someone else can pay for a token that signifies... something. At the very least, that they've purchased a token. I'm not sure what more.
Although unlike the author I'm okay with only the people who were so into a "cute baby" level video that they downloaded it for retaining a copy. Popular media getting forgotten in the churn of history is rather normal and it's worked out okay so far.
- elliekelly 5y agoThis is the big question I’ve yet to find a solid answer to about NFTs. First year law students are taught that property rights are a “bundle of sticks”[1] but I have absolutely no idea which “sticks” (if any?) an NFT conveys. [1]https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bundle_of_rights https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bundle_of_rights