>a single nuclear WEAPONS manufacturing plant in Iran If "mass disinformation campaigns" were very successful, then: 1."WEAPONS manufacturing plant" could be

>a single nuclear WEAPONS manufacturing plant in Iran If "mass disinformation campaigns" were very successful, then: 1."WEAPONS manufacturing plant" could be actually a "civilian-critical nuclear power plant related services" 2.You would never find statement 1 is unprovable. In stead you would insist that statement 1 must be false as the consequence of disinformation. It seems that hacking of any "civilian-critical" services , whether in US or Russia, is less critical than the hacking of people's mind (especially of smart developers/hackers) who would support and thus actively involve in hacking "evil" entities, along with other activities causing conflicts. I believe HNers minds are less likely to be hacked then those of other communities. (Technology topics are almost never be hacked. I'm talking about politics discussion which is more fascinating to watch how hacked HNer's minds interacting with each other.) My belief could be wrong because "Mind's I" could be hacked and it's unprovable.