Stipulations on being eligible (and thus "restricted") by them. I.e., in your scenario you are _not_ restricted. I've got to conclude you are deliberately misc

Stipulations on being eligible (and thus "restricted") by them. I.e., in your scenario you are _not_ restricted. I've got to conclude you are deliberately misconstruing the points I've made because you have some kind of "Unions are evil" agenda to push. Otherwise how the hell did you come to the conclusion that an employment benefit that doesn't even affect your fictitious scenario is somehow a demonstration of unions are bad.