I believe that my example demonstrates the contradiction in the rules. I’d be willing to bet that when this case goes to trial a similar example will be used -

I believe that my example demonstrates the contradiction in the rules. I’d be willing to bet that when this case goes to trial a similar example will be used - perhaps the I-35 bridge collapse for which a design flaw was ultimately identified as a major factor in the collapse. The state will have to admit that a professional engineer is obligated to speak up about problems in design, which is exactly what they are seeking to punish him for. This isn’t going to end well for Minnesota.