2 ms·
I'm struggling to see the advantage over currently popular languages.
by JustSomeNobody 5y ago
I'm struggling to see the advantage over currently popular languages.
- magicmouse 5y agoCompared to HTML/CSS/JS, Beads is much simpler. You can learn Beads in probably under 10 hours, while CSS takes at least 100 hours to master. Most of the older popular languages like C, C++, Java, have huge external libraries you have to learn to make graphical interactive software. So for the target application area, which is graphical interactive software, Beads is far simpler, and has many features to avoid error at compile time, and keep running with fault tolerance at execution time.