> I'm curious to know what/who would be needed to convince the scientific community. Scientists who know their stuff don't need a who. They can go purely on w

> I'm curious to know what/who would be needed to convince the scientific community. Scientists who know their stuff don't need a who. They can go purely on what. If many such scientists accept something, then I think the scientific community will be convinced. In the absence of this judgement from more knowledgeable scientists, people like me need to rely on who.