3 ms·
The ideas themselves aren't but it appears the paper was a blatant copy, image by image, and this IS a copyright violation.
by nextaccountic 5y ago
The ideas themselves aren't but it appears the paper was a blatant copy, image by image, and this IS a copyright violation.
- lodovic 5y ago"regardless of the form in which it is described, explained, illustrated, or embodied in such work" - didn't know this either, but apparently even image-by-image copies are allowed.
- Retric 5y agoScientific ideas are one thing, however if scientific papers don’t have copyright protection then Sci-Hub should be legally fine. So, that doesn’t seem to be the case.