4 ms·
I recommend reading Curtis Yarvin's recent writing on this exact topic [1]. [1]: https://graymirror.substack.com/p/there-is-no-ai-risk https://graymirror.subst
by noofen 5y ago
I recommend reading Curtis Yarvin's recent writing on this exact topic [1].
[1]: https://graymirror.substack.com/p/there-is-no-ai-risk https://graymirror.substack.com/p/there-is-no-ai-risk
- ctoth 5y agoI find his arguments very difficult to square with this article from 2015[1]. The prologue of [2] also paints a pretty compelling picture of how this might happen. Also > We don’t live in the world of Neuromancer and we never will. 99.9% of everything is mathematically invulnerable to hacking. Seriously made me chuckle. [1]: https://slatestarcodex.com/2015/04/07/no-physical-substrate-no-problem/ https://slatestarcodex.com/2015/04/07/no-physical-substrate-... [2]: https://www.amazon.com/Life-3-0-Being-Artificial-Intelligence/dp/1101946598 https://www.amazon.com/Life-3-0-Being-Artificial-Intelligenc...
- noofen 5y ago> Seriously made me chuckle. Yea, assuming someone had enough resources to create a powerful AI, they would also have enough resources for a hefty collection of unreleased 0days...