3 ms·
> That doesn't mean that it's not a lot of learnt tolerance to less than ideal UX. That's implying that there is "ideal UX" that would fit everyone and the cur
by Zababa 5y ago
> That doesn't mean that it's not a lot of learnt tolerance to less than ideal UX.
That's implying that there is "ideal UX" that would fit everyone and the current UX is not a series of compromises to try to be usable by anyone. I would personally think that's not the case.
- wiml 5y agoI don't think it's implying anything like that — it's just implying that there is better UX somewhere out there in the design space.
- fakedang 5y agoConsidering the OP's other comments here, I can't help but think that they're trying to solve the problem with a "we know better than you what you need" attitude. Their UX is the best, their website UI is the best, their policy towards a subscription model is the best, Yada Yada.