4 ms·
Not sure what you are getting at.
by ABeeSea 5y ago
Not sure what you are getting at.
- qqqwerty 5y agoWhite supremacists like to claim that twin studies prove that black people are less intelligent due to genetics. Apparently Sam seems to think that Democrats refusing to accept the shoddy science behind twin studies (the conclusions of which are often used in service of racist meta-studies) somehow implies that they are also "anti-science". Probably best to just ignore the comment. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pioneer_Fund https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pioneer_Fund https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_race_and_intelligence_controversy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_race_and_intell...
- ABeeSea 5y agoWow
- wpietri 5y agoYup. "Scientific" racism has a long history. Some of the various Confederate declarations of secession claim natural inferiority as a cause for slaveholding.
- SamReidHughes 5y agoTwin studies are mostly used to show that traits are heritable at an individual level. Edit: It strikes me that the strawman argument you've constructed is a perfect example of left-wing science denial. The endemic use of the technique in fields like psychology, criminology, biology, is something you prefer to ignore.
- ABeeSea 5y agoCan you link to a specific study that you claim is left wing science denial?
- astrange 5y ago"Heritable" doesn't mean "genetic" or "inherent to a person".
- inter_netuser 5y agodoes "genetic" mean "inherent to the person"?
- astrange 5y agoI wouldn't agree with that either, but most people would, so might as well stick it in there. Let's say it's part of the causal chain, but also your cells don't even have the same genome, it mutates over time, women integrate cells from their children, so it gets messy.