> Why not just tell people to supplement vitamin D instead? One very consistent pattern with vitamin D research is that association studies will find a major r

> Why not just tell people to supplement vitamin D instead? One very consistent pattern with vitamin D research is that association studies will find a major relationship between serum vitamin D and some health outcome.[1] But an RCT using vitamin D supplementation will find no effect.[2] That strongly suggests that serum vitamin D, at least as we measure it, is merely proxying for something else. The map is not the territory. There's an X-factor that's related to serum vitamin D, but is not just serum vitamin D. Artificial supplementation doesn't work. Since the vast majority of population vitamin D variance is related to sun exposure, that would strongly suggest that sun exposure is the X-factor that improves health. [1]https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/proceedings-of-the-nutrition-society/article/review-of-vitamin-d-status-and-cvd/76E6976CD5F522F7DCBC39E9859783BE https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/proceedings-of-the-n... [2]https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamacardiology/article-abstract/2615260 https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamacardiology/article-abst...