4 ms·
Then indeed there would be nothing to take issue with. However to make the analogy extremely tenuous (at best), one needs to show that there is no baby, rather
by chunky1994 5y ago
Then indeed there would be nothing to take issue with. However to make the analogy extremely tenuous (at best), one needs to show that there is no baby, rather than just claiming there isn't.
- jacquesm 5y agoI think in most cases the onus to prove that there is a baby is on the one making the claim that this is so. Besides the impossibility of proving a negative.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- mannykannot 5y agoSpeculation, by definition, lacks proof. Where would we be without speculation? Speculation has to range wider than proof for there to be any intellectual progress. Galileo, whose name is invoked frequently in these discussions, speculated broadly and was often wrong.