3 ms·
Wouldn’t a ‘solution’ only work if there actually is some underlying objective quality to a paper? It might be the case that different reviewers disagree becaus
by cortesoft 5y ago
Wouldn’t a ‘solution’ only work if there actually is some underlying objective quality to a paper? It might be the case that different reviewers disagree because there is no right answer, because there is no such thing as objective quality.
- sjg007 5y agoWell wisdom of the crowds suggest that there is a truth... and a conference is charged with representing the best so I think that randomization and meta moderation + other strategies are better in the long run.