3 ms·
On the one hand, I'm glad that there's more public effort in developing user interfaces beyond what's 'standard,' today. It indicates that "the market" senses
by rudolfwinestock 5y ago
On the one hand, I'm glad that there's more public effort in developing user interfaces beyond what's 'standard,' today. It indicates that "the market" senses the need. I applaud this venture.
On the other hand, they could start by not using such an eye-searing color scheme for their website.
- COGlory 5y agoYes that didn't exactly instill confidence
- fabrice_d 5y agoDon't judge a book by its cover! Also, lighthouse claims we're good with contrast / lisibility :)
- teawrecks 5y agoWhat if it's a book about designing book covers ;)
- TylerE 5y agoYou are not. That page generated an immediate Back from me. I wouldn't read that site if you paid me to.
- WaffleIronMaker 5y agoI understand the design might be quirky, but I'm not reading that.
- marlor 5y agoIt’s not judging a book by its cover. It’s judging a company that designs a smartphone UX experience by their website’s UX experience. My eyes. I hit back.
- KozmoNau7 5y agoI like it a lot, it's bright and bold and has good contrast. More sites and apps need to ditch the ridiculous dark mode fad and go bright and vivid, and I'm guessing most people who complain (and probably most dark mode adherents) have their display brightness set way too high. (Open a new text document or anything else bright white, and hold a piece of new white paper up beside it. The white on your screen should be the same brightness and color temperature as the paper. If it's noticeably brighter, you need to turn down the brightness on your monitor and/or increase the amount of lighting in your room. Basic ergonomics.)
- fakedang 5y agoThe fact that you guys don't listen to potential user feedback while also asking for a subscription model makes me say a straight "no".