4 ms·
Nice try angel investors. On a more serious note, investors need more companies to invest in. What does this post spread but propaganda? Why exactly should we t
by antonzabirko 5y ago
Nice try angel investors. On a more serious note, investors need more companies to invest in. What does this post spread but propaganda? Why exactly should we take more money early when the real question is efficacy and speed of growth? Throwing more money at this issue likely won't fix it, so a headline like this is misleading. Less angel investors is better, and it's better to be picky about them and get better terms if possible. The opposite of this article.
- peter422 5y agoYou think you are going to get better terms as a founder by being pickier about which angels you let in? You do understand that most angels invest in a company because their friend did. If you keep rejecting angels you aren’t going to get good terms because you’ll have nobody interested in your deal.
- antonzabirko 5y agoMaybe not by rejecting them all, but you won't get better terms if the sentiment in articles like this one becomes dominant.