4 ms·
It's "ordinary" for a random person in a different state to make such a complaint, after the license was already reinstated? It's ordinary to require one stipul
by jessaustin 5y ago
It's "ordinary" for a random person in a different state to make such a complaint, after the license was already reinstated? It's ordinary to require one stipulate to "dishonesty" when he was never actually dishonest? Such travails await every engineer who misses some mail? That seems like... dishonesty to me.
All people, whether they are engineers or not, have the right to sue for equal treatment under the law.
- dragonwriter 5y ago> It's "ordinary" for a random person in a different state to make such a complaint, after the license was already reinstated? The complaint was made first. The subject wasn’t aware of the complaint until later..
- brudgers 5y agoYes. It is pretty ordinary. Given that the Dakotas neighbor Minnesota, it would not be unusual for an out of state engineer to have a license in a neighboring state. Indeed it is ordinary for professionals to have licenses in many states because clients often have work in many states. In addition the motivation for the complaint, is different from the motivation of the license board. The license board almost certainly treating the case the same way it treats other cases. If it were not, StrongTowns would have sound procedural grounds for challenging the board. There is nothing unusual here. The First Amendment suit will almost certainly be thrown out. There does not appear to be any supporting case law. And lots of precedent against it.
- jessaustin 5y agoThe license board almost certainly treating the case the same way it treats other cases. I've seen no evidence of this.