Tobacco isn't the best example. Imagine a company that gatekeeps a language feature, and they are staffed with Creationists or Scientologists. Is it notable if

Tobacco isn't the best example. Imagine a company that gatekeeps a language feature, and they are staffed with Creationists or Scientologists. Is it notable if they define certain output as dangerous? No. Should you be skeptical? Yes. It's the same if they are staffed with Wokeists. In both cases they are defining what's "dangerous" according to their religion/ideology.