> lots of virtualization to manage already, I would want it to use the same tooling I'm not saying you would want to, but maybe their expectation is that you'd

> lots of virtualization to manage already, I would want it to use the same tooling I'm not saying you would want to, but maybe their expectation is that you'd plan to transition everything to their system. Either gradually as part of the normal cycle of replacing old hardware or all at once if you want to be aggressive. If their way is actually better, then it might make sense. You'd go through an annoying transition period but be better off in the end. The hardware options do seem limited, but maybe that would change if their business takes off and they get enough customers to justify it. They're definitely saying simplicity is a good thing, but maybe that's just marketing spin that sounds better than the alternative of saying they're not yet in a position to offer that flexibility.