3 ms·
Let’s say I were a professional engineer and noticed some design flaw in a busy bridge crossing a deep gorge, and that design flaw dramatically increases the li
by OldHand2018 5y ago
Let’s say I were a professional engineer and noticed some design flaw in a busy bridge crossing a deep gorge, and that design flaw dramatically increases the likelihood of the bridge plunging into said gorge.
If I point out the design flaw, I may diminish public confidence in the profession. If I do not point out the design flaw, the inevitable collapse of the bridge may also diminish public confidence in the profession, but only if the subsequent investigation reveals the design flaw and/or my knowledge of it.
What a terrible incentive!
- trhway 5y agoSnowden probably can chime in here :) >If I point out the design flaw pointing a design flaw in a project which already got huge money sunk in wouldn't earn much popularity to say the least.
- TheCapn 5y agoPublic confidence in the engineers comes from the ethical standard to put public & environmental safety paramount to all other requirements. An engineer noticing a fault and ignoring it goes against those ethics so your example is a bit poor, though I do see the relation to the topic at hand. Reading StrongTown's account of things is one side of the story, and they really do make it sound like a bunch of grumpy old assholes are throwing their weight around where they shouldn't be. Assuming this account of facts is accurate and not embellished, I really hope they win and people like the engineers pushing this bullshit get a reality check. I am a P.Eng... Canadian though, and even though I hold the title I do not use the stamp or really work as a traditional engineer a whole lot. I just feel its important to point out that our ethical standards aren't so easily circumvented as ignoring a safety hazard because it might make us look bad.
- OldHand2018 5y agoI believe that my example demonstrates the contradiction in the rules. I’d be willing to bet that when this case goes to trial a similar example will be used - perhaps the I-35 bridge collapse for which a design flaw was ultimately identified as a major factor in the collapse. The state will have to admit that a professional engineer is obligated to speak up about problems in design, which is exactly what they are seeking to punish him for. This isn’t going to end well for Minnesota.