3 ms·
This would almost certainly be the end result in the US too, if a plaintiff would have standing to sue. Unfortunately, that's the Catch 22 that's really prevent
by asimpletune 5y ago
This would almost certainly be the end result in the US too, if a plaintiff would have standing to sue. Unfortunately, that's the Catch 22 that's really prevented any of the particularly egregious practices from having their legal justification scrutinized in a court of law. However, because these programs are secret, you have by definition no way of knowing that you've been harmed and therefore have standing.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- lupire 5y agoThe "standing" decisions are just bad law by judges. The chilling effect on speech is enough to justify standing.