3 ms·
I think it’s a combination of “search is hard” and “witty comments / titles make it even harder to search for”. I’d argue most of these sites would be far bett
by stingraycharles 5y ago
I think it’s a combination of “search is hard” and “witty comments / titles make it even harder to search for”.
I’d argue most of these sites would be far better off with just using Algolia or Google as their main search engine and calling it a day.
- whatyesaid 5y agoIt's not some impossible problem with their resources. I think it's moreso the case that they prioritize newer (but less relevant) stuff you can still engage/social-mediaize with than the actual query even if you don't use the new filter.
- derefr 5y agoGoogle even has a Custom Search API that allows a site's backend to treat Google Search as (essentially) its own search cluster, ala ElasticSearch. Oddly, I've never heard of any actually using this API. Sites that integrate with Google only ever seem to do so by having their search box bounce you to a Google Search page.
- obventio56 5y agoWe do https://www.thecrimson.com/search/ https://www.thecrimson.com/search/