Agreed. If you typedef your struct, I can’t know if you wrapped it in a weird macro or if your data type is actually a renamed primitive. Once I gain familiari

Agreed. If you typedef your struct, I can’t know if you wrapped it in a weird macro or if your data type is actually a renamed primitive. Once I gain familiarity with your codebase, it won’t matter, but it otherwise unnecessarily raises the barrier of entry. That said, typedefs/macros may be essential for portability concerns.